digitech.base.eth pfp

digitech.base.eth

@datasync

136 Following
9 Followers
digitech.base.eth pfp
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
digitech.base.eth pfp
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
digitech.base.eth pfp
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
digitech.base.eth pfp
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
digitech.base.eth pfp
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
digitech.base.eth pfp
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
digitech.base.eth pfp
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
digitech.base.eth pfp
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
digitech.base.eth pfp
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
digitech.base.eth pfp
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
digitech.base.eth pfp
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
digitech.base.eth pfp
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
digitech.base.eth pfp
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
digitech.base.eth pfp
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
digitech.base.eth pfp
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
digitech.base.eth pfp
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
digitech.base.eth pfp
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
digitech.base.eth pfp
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
digitech.base.eth pfp
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
digitech.base.eth pfp
zkSync Team and Community Members, I would like to express my serious concerns regarding the recent airdrop and reward distribution process. As a community member who has been supporting and testing the network for a long time, I find the distribution process unfair. **My Questions and Concerns:** 1. **Unfair Reward Distribution**: Why were high amounts of $ZK given to users who added only a few hundred dollars in liquidity, instead of those who have been testing the network for three years? What is the rationale behind this decision? 2. **Lack of Transparency**: Can you explain why certain wallets received large amounts of $ZK without performing any transactions? Who owns these wallets? 3. **Importance of the Community**: Why did you not value the community members who have been supporting and using the project since day one? How do you justify your statement that "Community is Everything"? **Our Request:** We demand that the injustices in this process be corrected and a transparent explanation be
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction