Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Darryl Yeo đŸ› ïž pfp
Darryl Yeo đŸ› ïž
@darrylyeo
Svelte’s ecosystem is huge because it’s trivial to adapt vanilla JavaScript things. (It’s about to become even easier when Svelte 5 drops this April!) In React, everything has to be wrapped or rewritten in terms of React providers and hooks – it’s practically a different programming language.
5 replies
0 recast
10 reactions

typeof.eth đŸ”” pfp
typeof.eth đŸ””
@typeof.eth
Ugh, I don't wanna be the guy that is just constantly defending React (it's not that great, tbh), but _everything_? I'm using vanilla viem in a React project. Plus all the other go-to libs like lodash, zod, etc. > it’s practically a different programming language React has a learning curve, but it's really just JS.
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

Grins pfp
Grins
@grins
I might want to try some experiments that use the canvas as I always have to manipulate that within a use effect in react
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Jake pfp
Jake
@jklb.eth
Any chance the reasons svelte crew loves svelte so much is because they’re adopting it after learning lots and lots of stuff they maybe take for granted (ie gained experience) while working in other ecosystems, and are just better, more well-rounded engineers today compared to when they started writing react?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

William pfp
William
@wtracy
I remember once upon a time seeing posts from former Angular devs excitedly explaining that they didn't need React-specific libraries for everything because React worked great with vanilla JavaScript libraries!
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

YuriNondual pfp
YuriNondual
@yurinondual
I enjoyed this article. 6 months old by now, but still a great read https://joshcollinsworth.com/blog/antiquated-react
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction