Daniel Ospina  pfp

Daniel Ospina

@danielo

126 Following
93 Followers


Vitalik Buterin pfp
Vitalik Buterin
@vitalik.eth
The main challenge with crypto regulation (esp in the US) has always been this phenomenon where if you do something useless, or something where you're asking people to give you money in exchange for vague references to potential returns at best, you are free and clear, but if you try to give your customers a clear story of where returns come from, and promises about what rights they have, then you're screwed because you're "a security". The incentive gradient that this "anarcho-tyranny" creates ends up worse for the space than either plain anarchy _or_ plain tyranny. I would much rather see us move to the opposite situation, where issuing a token _without_ giving a clear long-term story for why it will maintain or increase in economic value is the riskier thing, and if you _do_ give such a long-term story and follow basic best practices then you're safe. Actually getting to this will require good-faith engagement, both from regulators and from industry.
12 replies
22 recasts
63 reactions

Daniel Ospina  pfp
Daniel Ospina
@danielo
Bringing a few years of DAO governance and a decade + of organisation design to zkSync :)
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Thew pfp
Thew
@thewseph
Join @rndao and @lino for an insightful talk on creating inclusive environments for neurodivergent DAO contributors. To address: - Demystifying ADHD - Misconceptions of ADHD - The appeal of DAOs - Personal insights June 6th https://lu.ma/eqg1sn03
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction

Daniel Ospina  pfp
Daniel Ospina
@danielo
Oh man that's lovely in practice but then you have to change everyone's model. Massive headache Might be worth it, but having been inventing new models for years, I often suffer from not going with a traditional (even if dysfunctional) model. Originality needs to be strategic 🙃
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Daniel Ospina  pfp
Daniel Ospina
@danielo
the more reason to think through a lense of governance of self-directed agents as opposed to governance of machines
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Daniel Ospina  pfp
Daniel Ospina
@danielo
DAO folks and coordination nerds, which channels should I check out? Where do you hangout? I want to leave twitter
0 reply
2 recasts
2 reactions

Daniel Ospina  pfp
Daniel Ospina
@danielo
Gm
1 reply
0 recast
5 reactions

Daniel Ospina  pfp
Daniel Ospina
@danielo
hey, DM me :)
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Daniel Ospina  pfp
Daniel Ospina
@danielo
What's a good way to add a DAO/company account here?
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

1sla.eth pfp
1sla.eth
@isla
Had our kick-off for the @RnDAO fellowship today. Over the next 3 months I'll be working with some @ftwdao frens and researching a topic dear to my heart, with the kind support of RnDAO CoLab and Arbitrum. Research focus: how to go about building the best on-chain game for community-led capital allocation.
2 replies
1 recast
5 reactions

Daniel Ospina  pfp
Daniel Ospina
@danielo
Swarm-DAOs would be - polycentric - open (capital, talent, and to a lesser extent IP and information) - most domains turned into platform capabilities (marketing/brand as a service to units, same for capital deployment, knowledge management, talent funnels, etc) We have a thesis coming out on this...
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Daniel Ospina  pfp
Daniel Ospina
@danielo
I don't separate the two, rather I think Swarm capabilities is what would give DAOs an advantage (potaeto potato) Swarming as the ability to form (autonomous) teams and rapidly aggregate teams to deliver more complex process/offerings. The organisation as a platform for collaboration innovation, Haier style
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Hats Protocol 🧢 🔜 EthCC pfp
Hats Protocol 🧢 🔜 EthCC
@hatsprotocol
It's hattening — the first ever Hats Protocol Demo Day! Join us to check out the future of onchain organizing, presented by a diverse set of orgs using Hats in innovative ways. Demos include:
3 replies
7 recasts
7 reactions

Daniel Ospina  pfp
Daniel Ospina
@danielo
I'd say into swarms :) the future is not solopreneurs nor DAOs as we've known them (monolithic, direct or representative democracy)
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Daniel Ospina  pfp
Daniel Ospina
@danielo
Isn't that building a highway for money laundering and war financing?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Daniel Ospina  pfp
Daniel Ospina
@danielo
Another thing that can help a lot is for the DAO to periodically define priorities for the grants. We have an AI (getharmoni.ca) that was designed for a large group to deliberate and find points of agreement (more effectively than vote or a forum). Something like that could be used to periodically define grant criteria
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Daniel Ospina  pfp
Daniel Ospina
@danielo
Maybe something in that direction could work?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Daniel Ospina  pfp
Daniel Ospina
@danielo
We're developing a format for a research fellowship where fellows receive training in user research, market research (ensure they're not reinventing the wheel and create value), and first principles thinking too. Stipend payment are conditional on milestones for sharing progress publicly, so it's open source research
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Daniel Ospina  pfp
Daniel Ospina
@danielo
How can I easily bring my twitter network? I'm trying to migrate here but that's proving a barrier
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

Daniel Ospina  pfp
Daniel Ospina
@danielo
We're organising a Demo Day on November 2nd to showcase our work on collaboration tech. The vision is to seed conversations about partnerships and other collaborations we can create for the collaboration tech ecosystem. Would be lovely to have you join us https://lu.ma/t3mgmfdy
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions