Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Danica Swanson pfp
Danica Swanson
@danicaswanson
Could community-owned Farcaster channels + cryptoeconomic rails (including the new @moxie.eth) spark a long-overdue creative renaissance by making it easier for creatives to make a living? (Note: this is a /zora shortened screenshot essay version of the latest edition of Slowcore Nerd Notes: Farcaster Channels = Creative Renaissance?) https://zora.co/collect/zora:0x24453ebe8d78de52f6d253cf26fec18ab34b041f/7?referrer=danicaswanson.eth
2 replies
6 recasts
24 reactions

tricil pfp
tricil
@tricil.eth
I certainly hope so!
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Danica Swanson pfp
Danica Swanson
@danicaswanson
Likewise. I've always found it objectionable that forum moderators, creative people, open source devs, etc., are forced into "day jobs" out of lack of other alternatives.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Edward H. Carpenter pfp
Edward H. Carpenter
@ehcarpenter
One reason the "day job" phenomenon is problematic is that within this ecosystem, creators also have to invest time to build a profile / work the algorithms and those who don't suffer from reduced exposure. Learning about evolving protocols and platforms and engaging in the social ecosystems - minting, dropping, tipping, reading and responding could be it's own "part-time job" - the administrative/social side of the creative coin. That's why I believe authors (and other creators) need to be paid for the content they create (including, ideally, casts and conversations like these) One big reason I write in Web3 and advocate the use of blockchain protocols is that crypto enables the possibility of micropayments across borders and timezones - which could open great opportunities for folks like @dummie.eth in regions like West Africa, Oceania, etc. Just my 6 $DEGEN 😁
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions