I think of "users don't care about decentralization" as being similar to "consumers don't care about what's in their food"

I work for Ethereum at the Ethereum Foundation.

Most kinds of virtue are like this: Invisible except when revealed to be absent via a flaw. You never know a bridge is safe for sure, you only know when it *wasn't* safe.

This is also a moloch problem: Projects that compromise will be able to ship shiny things that attract users.

Happy to report that users of MetaMask swaps are safe from the current Socket Gateway hack. We'll probably be writing a bit more soon about how our architecture allowed us to integrate Socket without being vulnerable to it.

And then when the failure happens, what's the correct play? Nobody likes someone saying "told ya so", or dancing on graves, and so it's up to users to suffer losses, look around, and conclude for themselves what safety they'd like for the next go around.

Just hope they notice?

co founder of @metamask . Making computers behave for us.

And then when the failure happens, what's the correct play? Nobody likes someone saying "told ya so", or dancing on graves, and so it's up to users to suffer losses, look around, and conclude for themselves what safety they'd like for the next go around.

Just hope they notice? https://warpcast.com/danfinlay/0x972de213