Should we rebrand Warpcast to Farcaster?

We separated Warpcast (the app) from Farcaster (the protocol) a few years ago. 

We've heard from many new users that this is very, very confusing. People hear about Farcaster, search in the app store, can't find anything called Farcaster and then churn.

Warpcast

i frame this debate as a consumer vs developer experience one. a unified name-change would sufficiently make it easier for consumers to adopt while the opposite is true for developers. 

my stand is with consumers. more consumers = more opportunity for devs to build on. as @v shared the no 1 issue why devs are reluctant to build is less consumer adoption with the protocol. 

rebrand is always welcome and i would say it is a sweet spot for the farcaster/warpcast name-change. why? because we have a budding/ dev eco with 

prioritize users now until farcaster is a mainstream social network app and developers would always catch up with building. #1 reason devs would be attracted to build is if user growth is ultra (billion-level users, million-level dau)

https://warpcast.com/damag.eth/0xc3b79299

we’re in a new internet with blockchain tech.