1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
🕸️ The Problem with “Web” 🕸️
The “web” analogy, coined by Tim Berners-Lee, evokes images of silken threads spun by a spider: delicate, hierarchical, and centralized. A web has a center. It’s fragile—tug one strand too hard, and the whole structure risks collapse. This metaphor subtly reinforces the internet’s real-world flaws: data monopolies, vulnerable centralized servers, and power concentrated in the hands of a few tech giants. It’s linear, static, and, frankly, "limited".
🍄 Why Mycelium Fits Better 🍄
Mycelium—the vast, underground fungal networks that connect forests and ecosystems—offers a richer metaphor. These networks are “decentralized”, “adaptive” and “mutualistic”. Unlike “Web” that assumes there’s some prying Spiders. Here’s why it matters: 1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
1. Decentralized Resilience
Mycelium has no central hub. If one pathway is destroyed, the network reroutes. Compare this to today’s internet: when a major server goes down, entire platforms vanish. A mycelial model would prioritize distributed nodes, reducing reliance on Big Tech’s chokeholds.
2. Organic Growth
Mycelium grows in response to its environment, forging connections where they’re needed. The internet, too, evolves organically—think grassroots communities, peer-to-peer networks, and open-source projects. A “mycelial internet” mindset would celebrate bottom-up innovation over corporate control.
3. Mutual Benefit
In nature, mycelium facilitates symbiosis: trees share nutrients, plants communicate threats. Imagine an internet designed for collective thriving—where data isn’t mined for profit but shared to uplift communities. It’s a shift from extraction to collaboration. 1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction