venturecapital

Which of the following would you take a bet on and why?

A. a founder that pivots to completely new ideas every 3 months

B. a founder that doesn’t pivot at all for 3 years (but is yet to see any positive traction inspite of the product being good in theory)

Founder @poster 
/ Glitch Artist (Sotheby's April 23)/ Founder /degenladies /poster /cc0

Does ‘A’ stop on the right ideas and see them through, or no?

I'd choose the first founder especially if it's a new project.
Which kind of founder would you choose.

It’s actually a combination of both. A founder who is open to new ideas every 3 months but can keep the overall direction and strategy in mind. 

Being open to A in order to achieve the goals of B.

A - all day

Very few Bs would actually be right

At least A is taking multiple shots on goal and finding a way forward

The caveat is a small % of B will change the world - but the idea has to be so contrairion, it can't feel remotely rational otherwise they wouldn't go that long without traction - skill issue

microsub.

I'm supporting you through /microsub!

43 $DEGEN

(Please mute the keyword "ms!t" if you prefer not to see these casts.)