Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Brenner pfp
Brenner
@brenner.eth
$250 bounty for the best deck for this idea, but for channels https://docs.google.com/document/d/1gsDO67VVxyhIyz2p8XyHfEKwYWjMgG6_NsFN3jcy5Vs/edit Using https://slideframe.replit.app/ cc @bountybot /bounties
12 replies
2 recasts
9 reactions

crim pfp
crim
@crim.eth
Yo this is crazy fkn wild. The ppl will not like this. You should add something like a public vote so that in reasonable situations, like say a creator getting their name, people vote for it. That way if it’s just personal ego or something, people are less likely to steal from inactive people etc
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Brenner pfp
Brenner
@brenner.eth
Farcaster created this new space for a creator. They can contribute to the protocol in return via paying the protocol a market price and tax. 5% is not a fixed / default rate. Protocol governance chooses the tax rate. 5%, 1%, .1%, whatever
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

crim pfp
crim
@crim.eth
I’m not saying it’s good or a bad idea personally, I’m thinking more so what the user will think. And I think as something that markets itself decentralised, having something forced on you is antithetical
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Brenner pfp
Brenner
@brenner.eth
Decentralized ≠ no ongoing cost of ownership
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

crim pfp
crim
@crim.eth
Didn’t say it was, but you should know especially now. It’s doesn’t matter if what you’re saying is technically correct. The vibe is all that matters. See “faster technologically superior tech” in terms of blockchain useage. Just because it should be so, doesn’t mean it will be so.
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions