Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
27 recasts
29 reactions

Ryan Wyatt pfp
Ryan Wyatt
@fwiz
Personally, I think @jessepollak (and Base) have been a great advocate for the Superchain (and continue to be so). I'll always want them to talk more about Optimism, but Base has an ecosystem to build, and plugging the infrastructure all the time doesn't make sense. OP Stack chains in the Superchain need their own identity and the freedom to have that. Here's how I see it: this is on the Optimism Collective to solve. * Shift the narrative from "Optimism = OP Mainnet" to "Optimism = the Superchain" * Ship interoperability (native OP token across Base, Mode, etc.) * Keep getting large ecosystem chains to build on OP Stack, contribute revenue, and join the Superchain * Make sure people know Base, Mode, Zora, World Chain, and all Superchains are contributing 15% of their sequencer fees to the Optimism Collective. * Let Grants Council cook and build and invest in the future of OP mainnet If we solve this, the story will tell itself and won't need to be authored by Base or Optimism.
16 replies
11 recasts
114 reactions

⚪️ cooper 🎩 ↑ pfp
⚪️ cooper 🎩 ↑
@cooperray
i don’t see how what you mentioned solves the narrative problem - infrastructure is inherently boring. i’m a big Optimism fan & supporter since day 1, but its *because* of the infrastructure, novel governance implementation +the promise of the entire ecosystem evolution. watching this unfold has been incredible
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

⚪️ cooper 🎩 ↑ pfp
⚪️ cooper 🎩 ↑
@cooperray
that being said, i don’t think an end user of an L2 really cares about underlying tech. investors should, but this is also more narrative driven leaning more into the narrative of diverse PGF initiatives +making clear that Optimism itself is what makes everything possible is crucial though. the 15% sequencer fee too
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction