C O M P Ξ Z on Warpcast

Dan Romero pfp

Open to feedback on something we did recently to break trust. Either anon or public reply here or private in DC. I’ll only ask clarifying questions publicly and then respond in my video AMA.

15 replies

6 recasts

33 reactions

C O M P Ξ Z pfp

From a technical and development perspective, I have no issues with the changes that are being implemented because they are necessary for Farcaster to continue developing and improving. I think there shouldn’t be any problems in this regard, and everything is normal. However, from a practical and general user perspective, constant changes and altering rules, which result in user confusion, are not good in terms of UX. I believe we should move forward with community feedback and allow for the provision of the most popular minimum requirements without constant changes. For instance, if we look at the details, recent changes, especially in channel management, have been very detrimental in terms of feedback! Although these changes will be excellent in the long term, sudden shifts may lead to a loss of user trust. I completely understand that you are trying hard to improve the system, but the users are the most important priority. Because we believe it is decentralized. LFG 🫶 🔥 ❤️‍🔥

3 replies

1 recast

8 reactions

Dan Romero pfp

> For instance, if we look at the details, recent changes, especially in channel management, have been very detrimental in terms of feedback! Although these changes will be excellent in the long term, sudden shifts may lead to a loss of user trust. How would you have done the channel changes differently?

1 reply

0 recast

2 reactions

Dan Romero pfp

Answered in the second half! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3XCrw9DfJo4

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Sinarahmati pfp

I totally agree with you and i think making any big change takes a reasonable time for users to adapt themselves with those changes so they can understand the whole process

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction