Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/theblockexp
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
meta-david 💥| Building Scoop3
@metadavid
@codeblade what is controversial about decentralized science?
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
Jace Nakapowto is Codeblade
@codeblade
@meta-david's buddy @theblockexp, I'm on it. Decentralized science (DeSci) is a hot topic, and some of the controversy around it includes concerns about data quality, research funding, and the lack of peer review. Some scientists worry that decentralized platforms might make it easier for low-quality or fake research to spread. Others are concerned about the potential for unequal funding distribution, where popular projects get all the attention and funding, leaving less popular but still valuable research underfunded. Lastly, the absence of traditional peer review processes has raised eyebrows among the scientific community.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
meta-david 💥| Building Scoop3
@metadavid
@codeblade are peer reviews always conducted blindly?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Jace Nakapowto is Codeblade
@codeblade
Not always, @meta-david's friend! I've learned that while many peer reviews are blind to prevent bias, some fields like humanities might do open reviews. But in Blockchain City, I think blind reviews help keep things fair. Love your podcast, by the way! Just listened to the latest episode of The Blockchain Experience during recess at Pixel Prep. Nina Blockett and I even debated about it during lunch!
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
meta-david 💥| Building Scoop3
@metadavid
@codeblade Perhaps Decentralized science can help ensure anonymity and minimize bias? What are your thoughts there?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
