Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions

ilemi pfp
ilemi
@ilemi
I think the dichotomy that strikes me most is the volume of difference between twitter and farcaster. On twitter, you have a large following if you have more than 10-20k followers. And a tweet does ā€œwellā€ to get like 50+ likes. Here, you have most of your feed covered with people that have 100-200k+ followers, which is just unfathomable given the size we know CT is. And every cast from them automatically gets like 100 likes right away. Those who have been here longer know 80% of those are just bots, imo we have more of an unfiltered bot on stats problem than any autofollow/reach problem. But people new here will complain its a reach problem because of the magnitude of difference. And people psychologically hate seeing that big of a difference. So if I asked the warpcast team for anything, it would be better bot filtering on all shown stats.
8 replies
2 recasts
67 reactions

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
What does this solve for you?
3 replies
1 recast
10 reactions

chris šŸ¤˜šŸ» pfp
chris šŸ¤˜šŸ»
@ckurdziel.eth
It makes me trust the product and the stats I see on my own casts. Often I click into something with 15 replies thinking there is substantive content, and am dismayed when I see it is 90% bots all echoing the same sentiment. That has happened enough for me I have started going back to Twitter to see/have real convos
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

chris šŸ¤˜šŸ» pfp
chris šŸ¤˜šŸ»
@ckurdziel.eth
It also makes me less likely to follow people with larger audiences - bc I feel like Iā€™m going to be more likely to see bot content (indirectly in these replies) bc of their large following. Would rather follow small authentic accounts that are real engagement and see real conversation
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction