Content
@
https://opensea.io/collection/soccer-19
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Chukwuka Osakwe
@chukwukaosakwe
is anyone here familiar with any of the other games that tifo claims are easier to analyse than football. i want to know what you think. @kmacb.eth? @kenny? https://youtu.be/K6KhzmxVWJc?si=UwyNSWtxBzKTZ_Iv
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
Plants
@plantsnft
A few thoughts. Some sports have 1v1 matchups. This makes a clean dataset (baseball) Football has some stop/start moments and we are seeing analaytics come in (set piece coach). Still overlooked is throwin success rate. Teams work so hard for possession then waste it on throwins Number of players is a factor. Basketball has 5. football has 11. American football also has 11 but has more obvious matchups. CB matched with WR is an obvious one. Football has the advantage tho that pretty much everyone plays a matchup zone. In American football defenses change each play. IMO this is a vote for football being “easier” to analyze cause defenses don’t change. What does change is tactics of where people line up and this is harder for football than American football. More options (LB flying up and down switching between d and a forward thinking winger (love you Marty cash)
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Chukwuka Osakwe
@chukwukaosakwe
and there's no standardisation for football positions. a lb in guardiola's system has a completely different set of duties from a lb in mourinho's system.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Plants
@plantsnft
There may not be standardization but there is bucketization (similar goals/freedom of movement) I’d argue there is no standardization in any sports. This is why strategy and player styles exist
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
