Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/cryptofamily
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Dima 🎩🐹
@chevapchevapovic
While quantum computing poses a threat to Bitcoin’s security, banks have multiple defenses in place to prevent a widespread collapse, River’s Leishman says. The debate over whether quantum computers could threaten Bitcoin is heating up once again, with River CEO Alexander Leishman arguing that Bitcoin is at greater risk than traditional banking systems. In an X post on Feb. 21, Leishman explained that in case with Bitcoin, the security of funds depends entirely on the private key. Once a public key is exposed, a quantum computer could access the funds with ease.
6 replies
1 recast
18 reactions
Lyudmila 🎩🔵
@kryptofeya
Banks are worried that they will be left without customers and earnings if there is full acceptance of bitcoin and cryptocurrencies, so once again they are raising doubts about security. That said, banks are not 100% safe either. 500 $DEGEN
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Cherry Carry 🎩
@cherrycarry
It seems to me that everyone is waiting for the quantum computer. Giants like bitcoin are already thinking about it.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Vera🎩
@vera17
Thanks for the information. And I always thought that cryptocurrency is completely protected. Now the opinion has changed. Good luck to you.🤝
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Elena Klyu
@ktybr
Did Leishman suggest any safety measures?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Tati 🎩🔵
@pliskot
It’s good that the quantum apocalypse is still more of a theory than a real threat!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
sailorcat
@cryptokitties
But Bitcoin’s decentralized nature makes it harder to apply quick fixes, so this is something the community will need to address proactively, perhaps through quantum-resistant algorithms or protocols. The stakes are high with something as foundational as Bitcoin’s security model. What do you think about this quantum computing dilemma in the context of Bitcoin and blockchain technology? Could quantum cryptography be the answer, or is a complete overhaul necessary?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
