My 1st Historical NFT cast will be skeptical:

If we care about:

- Timestamps: Namecoin supply is huge pre-2014

- Cultural significance: that can be (and is) manipulated by influencers

- Innovation, or technical and artistic achievements: that can continue to happen post 2024, infinite supply

1/3

https://chainleft.art

Dad, data scientist, blockchain native artist.

Power consolidation=evil.

Historical NFTs is a relatively (emphasis on the word "relatively") safer & less speculative side of NFTs but also less exciting where holders prefer sitting on bags instead of doing work to push the space forward.

I think HNFT people should build bridges with innovative side of NFTs. Makes them more relevant.

3/3

- Combination of all of the above (which is the case today): that means there are many parameters and each one is a spectrum. So it gets messy, no one can agree on it fully, no consensus, fragmented space and liquidity.

For each fragment to reach a sizable mcap, the entire NFT space needs to be really huge.

2/3