Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

ccarella pfp
ccarella
@ccarella.eth
Today's Essay: The Primitives of a Farcaster Application
2 replies
4 recasts
19 reactions

vrypan |--o--| pfp
vrypan |--o--|
@vrypan.eth
I have a problem with this. I think there are two layers in Farcaster and we don't have the proper terms to address them. Let me give some examples, not sure how to describe it properly. Internet apps: Email, Web, FTP, video streaming Web apps: twitter, Facebook, Amazon, etc. Of course what you describe are "Farcaster apps". They would be at the "web apps" layer (could even say they run inside "farcaster browsers", like Warpcast, Supercast, etc.) But "Farcaster apps" are also Warpcast DCs, and Warps, which would be at the "Internet apps" layer. Even channels for now. How do we make the distinction?
1 reply
0 recast
5 reactions

bradq   pfp
bradq
@bradq
I'm intrigued at a sentence....what would be a good example of this: 'Creators could use Composer Actions to craft and publish content directly within the platform' --give me a normal one and a dream for down the road if you feel like it.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction