Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
anon
@superanon
nah, this is wrong. I helped my mom cut out coupons. we didn't have the prestige or privilege of acting entitled to happiness or loyalty. we survived with the resources we had, not the impressions we gave out. builders are in the same boat, too. how many projects split revenue back to the network and dependencies? closer to 0 than not. "couponer energy" and there's all the platforms that overdemand usage data and volunteer evangelism, like it's cheap fodder. which is why "farmer" keeps getting passed as derogatorily as it has been. and you know there's still going to be some token with dilution. negging market takers, instead of delivering actual quality product, is just arrogant cabal-type bs.
3 replies
2 recasts
13 reactions
Catch0x22
@catch0x22.eth
both true but "closer to 0 than not" isn't accurate in comparison to value given out it outweighs in most cases. airdrops are in a weird place because they've become an attention grabbing technique and stopped being a way to surprise those early enough to test the product the nature of VC and market making sucks but it's just business
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
anon
@superanon
okay, milton friedman. the consumer will pull more market out of a hat. it's ponzi value, on net there is a greater fool in aggregate. the game is the game, but don't insult ppl's intelligence with "it's not a meatgrinder" psyops. it is what it is, either ppl figure out a bubble too big to fail, or not.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
