Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
lucas
@elesel.eth
flat earthism isn’t interesting as a theory, but as a stance. it’s a case study in nonlinear epistemic drift, where denialism becomes a kind of epistemic rebellion. what matters isn’t the content but the form of belief: radical deviation, self-selected isolation, and the refusal to outsource truth to institutions. instead of mocking that impulse, what if we harnessed it? imagine incubating epistemic dissidents (cells of radically divergent thinkers) and funding their inquiries. not to confirm what we know, but to explore what our paradigms suppress. we’ve confined knowledge making to academia vs internet chaos. it’s time for deliberate epistemic pluralism structured heterodoxy, not blind consensus.
4 replies
1 recast
6 reactions
Catch0x22 (2025 variant)
@catch0x22.eth
DeSci solves this I think there's probably more interesting things to fund tho like Egyptology
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction