Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Cameron Armstrong pfp
Cameron Armstrong
@cameron
Content Experiment #4: Live casting my reactions to @cdixon.ethā€™s ā€œRead Write Ownā€ It might take 3 hours or all week, but Iā€™ll cast all my thoughts as I have em. 1st impression: Wonderful cover art and an NFT mint I couldnā€™t get to work on mobile (I guess itā€™s delivering the real crypto experience šŸ™ƒ)
9 replies
6 recasts
46 reactions

Cameron Armstrong pfp
Cameron Armstrong
@cameron
Also what an incredibly stacked book jacket. These are some heavy hitters fr Which makes me wonderā€¦
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

Cameron Armstrong pfp
Cameron Armstrong
@cameron
Who is ā€œRead Write Ownā€ written for? Itā€™s not immediately obvious to me, but there are some hints already. Big Tech is noticeably absent from the jacket, but Big (Disney + Nike) and Tech (Altman + Suleyman + Kelly) are both all in! Mark Cuban as bait for business book readers is also telling.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Cameron Armstrong pfp
Cameron Armstrong
@cameron
Combine this w the veritable art piece of a cover illustration (beach sunrise digitalized painting?? - what a specific vibe) My guess rn is RWO is written for non-independently wealthy, but still-relatively-self-actualized Silicon Valley operators AND anyone that used to tweet a lot from Brooklyn Letā€™s begin šŸ«”
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Cameron Armstrong pfp
Cameron Armstrong
@cameron
god Iā€™m such a sucker for Dyson adjacent content - gg on quote selection this is gonna get some CS undergrads absolutely ripping on random ass MVPs for new social networks
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

Cameron Armstrong pfp
Cameron Armstrong
@cameron
Table of Contents is MUCH denser than expected. Not revising my intended audience yet, but i am curious how this ends up playing out. Some corpo-tech books and up just repeating the same thing in a bunch of different ways bc people are just skimming anyways but fingers crossed here itā€™s not!
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Cameron Armstrong pfp
Cameron Armstrong
@cameron
TOC pt 2 - itā€™s interesting to note how much actual crypto native vernacular is used. (Not much but he did say NFT which is bold and I appreciate that a lot) Imo this is the right decision for the audience I THINK itā€™s for Farcasters might be less impressed by this bc it might make everything feel dumbed down
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Cameron Armstrong pfp
Cameron Armstrong
@cameron
Introduction - Mostly a specific version of history where Big Tech is obviously the bad guy in this narrative. I think it plays into public perception (and tbh reality) of modern tech well Software as creative expression isnā€™t as effective imo but blockchains as steel vs wood is a GREAT device
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Cameron Armstrong pfp
Cameron Armstrong
@cameron
1. Why Networks Matter Nice little ode to the power of interconnections + math Neat riposte to the reflexive ā€œREGULATE MOREā€ that democratic aides who have to read this to brief their lawmaker on RWO will def think while reading this Also Iā€™m such a sucker for well-curated quotes to complement ideas
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Cameron Armstrong pfp
Cameron Armstrong
@cameron
2. Protocol Networks is nerd bait tech history porn done v well Itā€™s a great journey linking Greek linguistics to techno-hippie developers to centralized name spaces to decentralized take rates to RSS and more. It omits some important specifics but itā€™s ch 2 w a full exploration later! (also omfg THE QUOTES)
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

Cameron Armstrong pfp
Cameron Armstrong
@cameron
Itā€™s also important to point out that @cdixon.eth isnā€™t just talking about why protocols make sense for fundamental infra or why they havenā€™t worked since email/web Heā€™s pointing out specifically the ideas that devs like as solutions but have never worked irl. Heā€™s logicking HackerNews into a corner.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Cameron Armstrong pfp
Cameron Armstrong
@cameron
3. Corporate Networks - another history lesson except this time on how corporations corrupted the internetā€™s permissionless garden of Eden Hereā€™s where Iā€™m getting nervous. I am immediately suspect of anything VC-fund adjacent bc the incentives are what they are. Chris notably founded @a16zcrypto soā€¦
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Cameron Armstrong pfp
Cameron Armstrong
@cameron
I figured this chapter would either be: 1. A softball retelling hard enough to piss off normal people but not enough to alienate the Zuckā€™s of the world Chris inhabits Or 2. A jugular shot at everything old so a16z can rebuild the internet in their own image w their portfolio coā€™s Itā€™s sorta in the middle?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Cameron Armstrong pfp
Cameron Armstrong
@cameron
Facebook is an example villain, but Chris is working really hard to make the company the villain NOT the entrepreneur And not really the co, but the coā€™s DESIGN is his villain Itā€™s a really neat device that abstracts away the perceived ā€œevilnessā€ of capitalism and diverts the ire to the corp network design
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Cameron Armstrong pfp
Cameron Armstrong
@cameron
Anyway on to crypto bits šŸ«” (fun fact Iā€™m ALSO a sucker for negative space)
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Cameron Armstrong pfp
Cameron Armstrong
@cameron
4. Blockchains Itā€™s interesting to me to choose this quote when we can clearly see many examples where platform intermediation is a feature (donā€™t have to deal w customer support is common boon of platforms) not a bug It fits with the sell of ā€œcorporations badā€ but might be a little too easy to beat up online
1 reply
1 recast
1 reaction