Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

brokenbyte.eth pfp
brokenbyte.eth
@brokenbyte.eth
I’m constantly shocked at the cognitive dissonance of people who avoid cigarettes but smoke cannabis regularly. Smoking anything via combustion is damaging to your lungs 🫁 Vaporizering is less harmful, and inhaling nothing but oxygen/nitrogen is best ✨ https://youtu.be/_rBPwu2uS-w?si=NMT5KwAVFLkvOMnv
4 replies
2 recasts
9 reactions

borodutch @ lunchbreak.com pfp
borodutch @ lunchbreak.com
@farcasteradmin.eth
i am one 🫑 ask any questions you want, all my beliefs are also deeply rooted in science there is no dissonance: risk is not binary, but it is a spectrum: so far no one got cancer from smoking weed, but almost everyone smoking cigs gets cancer feel free to inquire for answers!
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

brokenbyte.eth pfp
brokenbyte.eth
@brokenbyte.eth
Hullo hullo ✨ Yes indeed it’s not binary & one reason I think it’s not is that 1. Cigarettes contain a bunch of other garbage that corps shove into them, and 2. Joints are generally consumed with far less frequency then ciggies. My point remains that combustion inhaled is detrimental and should be considered πŸ’­
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

borodutch @ lunchbreak.com pfp
borodutch @ lunchbreak.com
@farcasteradmin.eth
it should be considered, but for instance, if i'm offered a joint, i'd go for it without second though however, when my friends smoke cigars, i pass risks are *so much more* when smoking tobacco in any form, like magnitudes more full disclosure: i almost exclusively do edibles exactly because of your points
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

borodutch @ lunchbreak.com pfp
borodutch @ lunchbreak.com
@farcasteradmin.eth
@brokenbyte.eth e.g., i never smoke tobacco and i'm on a fully vegan diet β€” so my risks are drastically down already the real question you should be asking is why do people care enough to not smoke, yet they eat meat that is proven to be carcirogenic? because eating meat is magnitudes riskier than smoking weed
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

brokenbyte.eth pfp
brokenbyte.eth
@brokenbyte.eth
I see. You’ve considered the risks and chose appropriately. I’m actually skeptical of the harm around tobacco as it’s just another plant like cannabis, with thousands of years of use. Coupled that with the nootropic benefits of nicotine… Personally I’m waiting on the science around vaporized tobacco πŸ’­
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

borodutch @ lunchbreak.com pfp
borodutch @ lunchbreak.com
@farcasteradmin.eth
here's some info https://www.healthline.com/health/does-nicotine-cause-cancer#nicotine-and-cancer
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

brokenbyte.eth pfp
brokenbyte.eth
@brokenbyte.eth
Oooooh that’s interesting. Great link, though the association still seems shaky from the language in the article. The CHK2 suppression is cool though!
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

borodutch @ lunchbreak.com pfp
borodutch @ lunchbreak.com
@farcasteradmin.eth
emt and suppressing chk2 is *not* cool it literally leads to cancer
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

brokenbyte.eth pfp
brokenbyte.eth
@brokenbyte.eth
Lmfao ya I know dude it’s just novel info is what I meant πŸ˜‚
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction