Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
A reminder on channels - Channels are *not* decentralized yet - Do not squat channel names with the intention to sell them to brands later; this is extractive behavior - When channels are decentralized and incorporated into the protocol later this year (likely onchain!), then you can do what you want! Just like FIDs
28 replies
29 recasts
289 reactions

Brenner pfp
Brenner
@brenner.eth
What’s your take on incorporating a mechanic like this into channels? I think this provides a solution to the downsides of squatting while generating protocol revenue, and being configurable on an ongoing basis https://docs.google.com/document/d/1gsDO67VVxyhIyz2p8XyHfEKwYWjMgG6_NsFN3jcy5Vs/edit
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Possibly. I'm more in favor of doing the work to remove value from squatters. You can't get 100% but I view squatting as immoral. You're benefitting from someone else's (in this case the protocol's) hard work for personal gain with minimal work or financial risk.
4 replies
1 recast
12 reactions