Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

  pfp
@undefined
Hi @percs, I want to address your concerns directly and offer my sincere apologies. 1st - We really liked the design of your website. We took inspiration from it while our site was still under construction. 2nd - We clearly instructed users not to use the website, and all paying users are aware of what's currently available on the platform. 3rd - The brand logos were placeholders used during development and were never meant to imply any false affiliations. We have removed them to avoid any further misunderstandings. We want to emphasize that we are not sponsored in any way with the branded affiliations. I respect you as a fellow Farcaster and a good builder, and I want to apologize again for the disappointment and any actions that may have caused it. If we confused other users with the website, particularly with the sponsorship banner, @cauliflower and I would like to apologize sincerely.
104 replies
6 recasts
115 reactions

Steve pfp
Steve
@sdv.eth
Apology or not, this type of oversight is a bad example to set as a builder. Slow down next time, not worth tanking your reputation for something as sloppy as this. The fact that no one else called this out earlier is just as disappointing, if not more.
1 reply
0 recast
12 reactions

dawufi pfp
dawufi
@dawufi
bruh he actually claimed the partnerships in a cast when @brennen.eth praised him the audacity
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

brennen pfp
brennen
@brennen.eth
I mean I didn't know shit and thought it was funny. In my personal opinion, we live in a hyper competitive space with lots of competing software. I don't think we should be cutting off heads because one site looks like another. 90% of the tokens on-chain are copy pastas.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

dawufi pfp
dawufi
@dawufi
oh - i cut off heads when people claim others work as their own and attempt to charge people money off the false claims. it would have been so easy to simply walk it back and say "oh those aren't our partners - we copied a website but we'll update it now to reflect reailty" but instead they doubled down. shows character or lack thereof hopefully its clear im not coming after you, you were just in the thread. probably didn't need to tag you in hindsight.
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions