Should we implement an mechanism where every post burns a certain amount of  $ANON? This might reduce low quality posts

https://anoncast.org | anonymous posting for $ANON holders, powered by zk proofs | CA 0x0Db510e79909666d6dEc7f5e49370838c16D950f @anontokenbase

would be hard to implement without creating an on-chain trail that negates the anonymity.

I haven't fully fleshed out this idea and there might be issues with users deprecating their balances but....

create a contract that holds a balance for users to contribute to that they can never withdraw from. This balance then gets burned anonymously when someone posts. It's a bit like how tornado works but instead of withdrawing it burns for the post

thinking more: if you create a deposit for every post it has a decent anonymizing effect, so up front you make 10 deposits (and so does everyone else) and then over time as you make posts you burn 1 deposit at a time. posting would involve a zk proof like this one:

thinking more: if you create a deposit for every post it has a decent anonymizing effect, so up front you make 10 deposits (and so does everyone else) and then over time as you make posts you burn 1 deposit at a time. posting would involve a zk proof like this one:

https://github.com/tornadocash/tornado-core/blob/master/circuits/withdraw.circom