politics

Is this in service of a “higher principles” or a “tribal adherence”?

I wonder if this same driver would have let a person enter the bus without a mask in the summer of 2020?

Are you actually comparing a physical equipment that's meant to block disease spread in public with existence of a human being who's born somewhere they can't control being born in???

https://chainleft.art

Dad, data scientist, blockchain native artist.

Power consolidation=evil.

Not at all. Just pointing out that human behavior in America is far more animated by tribal adherence than some appeal to a higher principle.

My tribe says X is bad, thus X is bad.
My tribe says Y is good, thus Y is good.

No, I'm implying the driver isn't exercising any moral analysis at all.

Just a blind lemming following the precepts of their social group.

but you're implying that the driver should have the same moral qualms about someone's birth place vs someone's choice of risking others. What am I missing here? What's the tribalistic moral choice here? Is it the belief that "masks don't actually prevent spreading diseases"? I can accept that (even if I don't agree).