Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Boona 🎩 pfp
Boona 🎩
@boona
My Top 9 on @rodeodotclub featuring @p1x3lboy, @metaisdope, @jjjjjohn, @markwebster, @paul-prudence, @rinna, @loackme, and others
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
Callum Wanderloots ✨ pfp
Callum Wanderloots ✨
@wanderloots.eth
How are you liking it so far?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Boona 🎩 pfp
Boona 🎩
@boona
Honestly it’s a vibe man. Getting to collect wips and works that may not be part of artist main body of work is really cool
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Callum Wanderloots ✨ pfp
Callum Wanderloots ✨
@wanderloots.eth
Nice! That’s an interesting way to look at it, glad you’re enjoying it :) What do you think of people minting the same work on rodeo as a “post” and then as part of a limited edition on a different contract?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Boona 🎩 pfp
Boona 🎩
@boona
Definitely don’t subscribe to minting “posting” to rodeo then minting a 1/1
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Callum Wanderloots ✨ pfp
Callum Wanderloots ✨
@wanderloots.eth
Meaning, you think that having the same work on both types of chains (rodeo contract vs sovereign contract) would be bad for the artists?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Boona 🎩 pfp
Boona 🎩
@boona
Correct While it’s on a rodeo contract, the artist is minting it. Just like asking the question if an artist minted on an OS shared contract does it make the art OpenSea’s or the artists?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Callum Wanderloots ✨ pfp
Callum Wanderloots ✨
@wanderloots.eth
Oh sure, so that’s where I see actually a value distinction in shared contracts v sovereign contracts. So perhaps the question is: how much does the context of the mint change the value of the art? Eg if I mint a work on rodeo to promote the piece that I then sell as “fine-art” with a limited edition manifold series, shouldn’t the contract indicate the relative value? In that sense, the context of a “social post” vs “fine-art” should enable the artist to post the same piece twice and clearly have the value prop indicated to the collector? (Really appreciate your thoughts, this is something I’ve been struggling with)
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Boona 🎩 pfp
Boona 🎩
@boona
Appreciate this breakdown man, and yeah it definitely has created the need for actual candor and creative thought I think just due to the fact that shared contracts will always exist it’s hard to enforce Just theorizing here, would be a dope flow to see the work come to life on Rodeo/Zora through different stages, then see the final piece minted on a sovereign contract For the collector, it would allow people to have ownership in part of the process and if they had a strong connection with it, they could have everything (stages + final) Different access points and such, I’m sure there are other examples that will be tried out
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Callum Wanderloots ✨ pfp
Callum Wanderloots ✨
@wanderloots.eth
Yeah! And that makes sense to me for sure, introducing bts, WIP, context; all of the circumstances surrounding the creation of art itself. As a photographer, the wip is pretty much unedited or edited, so that process itself is hard to capture as a WIP. But my understanding too is that rodeo and zora app are trying to be like web3 insta, in which case people publish the final product of their art AND mint to their own contract. If these are web3 insta, why should it matter to the fine art crowd if it’s minted as a post? To your point on shared contracts, that’s why I’m suggesting the “mint post” style contract would not be considered the same tier as a fine art, self sovereign mint. There’s an argument that the average purchaser would be confused if it was the shared or sovereign contracts, but that’s kind of the point of blockchain, that we can trace if it came from rodeo or manifold 🤔 What do you think?
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction