I've spent the last few months in deep conversation with the @coinbase listings team on how they can better support and lift up builders, whether it's on @base or any other chain (L1, L2, everywhere)

There's a difference between what Coinbase wants to list, and what they're able to list, based on their status as a regulated exchange — but the team understands the lack of clarity and frustration and are committed to making the process better.

I know it's slow and I'm frustrated too — but me and the team are going to keep working until its fixed. I'll be having a discussion on the Regulatory Landscape with Paul on Thursday on @base, would love folks to tune in.

https://x.com/iampaulgrewal/status/1884051994324947001

@base builder #001; onchain cities w/ OAK & city3

real time case study on your discussion would be helpful - I'll throw out of few requests:

BASE:  KEYCAT, SKI MASK DOG

ETH:  0xba386A4Ca26B85FD057ab1Ef86e3DC7BdeB5ce70
(1.5 yrs old, very active community, millions in trading volume, 80% supply burned, no formal team, no allocation on launch, pure organic, previous ATH 90M mc, good distribution (bubble maps note:  a lot of community has donated a LOT, so may be where that shows up)

Can you ask them to dissect these?