Founders

Most of these airdrop strategies feel rushed and not very thought out to me. Like no one’s thinking 2 moves ahead  

People are gonna leave after they farm your token and get lost in their spreadsheet of the next 12 farms 

Like most of crypto, interesting tool or incentive, rushed to market

Appreciated this Variant piece on “progressive ownership”. After vetting, opt in instead of opt out by default for collecting a project token

That direction could incentivize much needed product monetization and retention fundamentals

Building Chonks, /contractreader, /dropframe and basepaintbot.xyz| Solidity & full stack dev | https://gallery.so/backseats

Appreciated this Variant piece on “progressive ownership”. After vetting, opt in instead of opt out by default for collecting a project token

That direction could incentivize much needed product monetization and retention fundamentals https://variant.fund/articles/progressive-ownership-model-application-tokens

Building @objects | prev Product: Meta, XMTP (DMs on Coinbase)|

⦲ ATL ➣ NYC ➣ MAP ◾️

montez.cloud

You'd think they'd learn after the last cycle.

In my opinion, every project should follow Optimism's airdrop strategy of airdropping over the span of several years. Even if people were only using Optimism for farming purposes at first, using them so routinely for 
so long can cause strong habits to form.

Active Supporter of /women-biz                

| https://www.chrisblair.xyz/

Yeah I see your point. But don't some teams include genuine engagement as a criteria? Like quality discussions in Discord, etc.? Sounds like a good fix but also a lot more work.

Trouble is that genuine users have less stamina than the average farmer. 

Muddies the ecosystem with low quality actors and content as farmers guess what will work over years.