Content pfp
Content
@
https://opensea.io/collection/nouns
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction

gami.eth pfp
gami.eth
@gami.eth
Still possible to fork Nouns DAO? āŒā—Ø-ā—Ø
4 replies
2 recasts
10 reactions

Volky pfp
Volky
@volky.eth
Not without passing a prop https://www.nouns.camp/proposals/662?tab=transactions Fork treshold was set to 100% when the DUNA was established
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

gami.eth pfp
gami.eth
@gami.eth
so new entrants have an option for fair exit, but ogs are left holding the bag? also, if duna legals prohibit certain things, we are limited in our revenue options, and we are destined for zero under this regime? why did we actually form a duna? has there ever been a clear answer from anyone? is it a liability thing?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Volky pfp
Volky
@volky.eth
the promise was to better interface with meatspace but what's happened is that we just became too afraid to do the things we used to do because they would void the DUNA protections we didn't even have in the past everything has to be triple checked with legal dept, and we don't have one
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

gami.eth pfp
gami.eth
@gami.eth
it's over for the canounical instance?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Bixbite šŸ‘½ pfp
Bixbite šŸ‘½
@bixbite
The canonical instance should have remained the OG DAO and the Duna should have been an opt in fork, but what do I know.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

gami.eth pfp
gami.eth
@gami.eth
agreed.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction