Content
@
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction
Dara Khan
@spookyaction-btc
One of the starkest findings from Map the Nounsverse: over 50% of all executed proposals have no updates on Propdates.wtf. Social accountability is critical to maintaining a decentralized effort like Nouns. But there is room for deeper onchain acccountability without slowing teams down. Especially once teams are funded, sometimes with 1% or more of the DAO's treasury. From our research, at-best, 1-2% of updates are provided in other channels like Farcaster, X, or in the Nouncil/Nouns Discord servers. Some of these proposals with no updates/abandoned are six-figures+ in USD. Nouns has several other social accountability mechanisms, including @maty's work on proposal updates, proptracker.wtf, and @nounswap 's treasury data. More from the report: https://mirror.xyz/decentdao.eth/8IQ_hbitGd-U_8Gif0VA0fJtp0IqDPGBJWUeUyAh3HA
4 replies
1 recast
8 reactions
Bixbite 👽
@bixbite
….. to be fair, Propdates wasn’t created until Prop 391 😆 implemented after Prop 412…..So technically only 214 proposals would qualify for this, meaning they knew about Propdates & the expectation of an update upon proposing. Also there are a bunch of proposals that are maintenance ones such as staking or claiming ETH, not sure any updates have been given because the transaction automatically happens. That’s the issue with data, there are always a few stories you can tell with it.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Dara Khan
@spookyaction-btc
@bixbite I want the numbers to tell the truth! Can props before 412 not provide Propdates? Do all new props know about Propdates and understand it is expected to provide updates (social layer, not suggesting it should be required...altho...). Good point re: maintenance/admin props. I will see if I can parse those out.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
