Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Zero Weight
@zeroweight
Nouns Proposal 546: Fund Retroactive Rounds via Rounds.wtf Reply with +for, +against, or +abstain and a reason to control 3 /nouns votes. Read prop → https://www.nouns.camp/proposals/546
7 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
Bixbite 👽
@bixbite
+against - currently with the way the algo is set up the same people with large audiences are the ones that receive the majority of the funding, I also think the funding that was set aside for Prop House should be used towards Rounds as the infra of Rounds is not as extensive as Prop House.
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
