Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions

Bitfloorsghost pfp
Bitfloorsghost
@bitfloorsghost.eth
kinda getting the impression that the conflating of what moxie is doing and farcaster is doing is wrong (as someone who wasnt sure yesterday) i think it's just coincidental the changes that farcaster is making with channels plays into what moxie is doing in some regard don't think there's anything beyond that tbh
6 replies
0 recast
38 reactions

GeeGee๐Ÿ”ฅ pfp
GeeGee๐Ÿ”ฅ
@nhp
I think in the same lines I don't see it as a bad thing But there's something there and I can't put my finger on it I haven't been active enough to notice the details But I'm gonna ๐Ÿ˜
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Mikado pfp
Mikado
@mikadoe.eth
Token gating is possible rn I don't see the relation and I'm sure there's no intentions in that.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

S.G Baby pfp
S.G Baby
@sgbaby.eth
They seem to be complementing each other.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Dan pfp
Dan
@seyex.eth
so are you saying itโ€™s a good thing or not
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

TaylorWebb.eth pfp
TaylorWebb.eth
@taylorwebb.eth
I'm not convinced the changes are coincidental, but I don't think its a problem if they aren't. The FC protocol is still fluid and trying to find product market fit, and Moxie may help it get there.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Cryptotvplus pfp
Cryptotvplus
@cryptotvplus1
๐Ÿค”๐Ÿค”๐Ÿค”
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Mitraa.base.eth ๐Ÿ”ตโ“‚๏ธ pfp
Mitraa.base.eth ๐Ÿ”ตโ“‚๏ธ
@mitra-h66
๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿ‘
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Lyrica pfp
Lyrica
@lyrically
Really
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction