Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

christin pfp
christin
@christin
Megalopolis *can* be a good movie. <mild spoiler alert> I read the bad reviews so my expectations were minimal. Yet, the first third of the movie was eye-blinking baffling. The movie did not maintain a consistent esthetic, with some scenes ruining the suspense of disbelief by mingling early 2000s technology with that of ancient Rome. every actor spoke as though they were in a film noir while reciting Shakespeare, at times literally. But underneath, it is a simple story about hope, grief, jealousy, seeking acceptance from in-laws, and healing the core mother wound. I resonated with these elements and saw myself in them. The movie is more palatable if one goes in understanding that it's magic realism with the pacing and transitions of a theater play. Expect vignettes over coherency, like haruki murakami plot lines that make you feel some type of way without the words to describe them. <Like @ted I was also left speechless, so I thought it will make a good /firstdraft challenge!>
4 replies
1 recast
13 reactions

rileybeans pfp
rileybeans
@rileybeans
oh i had no idea, still haven't watched the original
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

christin pfp
christin
@christin
what's the original??
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

rileybeans pfp
rileybeans
@rileybeans
Metropolis (1927)
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions

Laura pfp
Laura
@birdsoar
*shouts in dumb bitch* WHAT
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions

christin pfp
christin
@christin
😹
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Laura pfp
Laura
@birdsoar
WAIT *exclaims smart bitch* I have seen Metropolis and can confidently say they're very different in terms of plot! Also also - THIS EXPLAINS THE ART DECO
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

rileybeans pfp
rileybeans
@rileybeans
smart bitch is right, I was wrong. I must have heard someone compare the two earlier in the year and it stuck
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction