Curious what people think of this: 

Chains want builders 
Builders want users
Users want yield or rewards 

so get users to earn that yield by using as many apps on a chain as possible, the more active they are in the ecosystem, the greater they get.

this means more user activity which could incentivize more builders to deploy etc and then cycle repeats 

the sustainable way to do this would be to distribute sequencer fees to the most active users proportionally

note: Probably need someone to verify humanity etc at one point to prevent Sybil’s

lore @optimism | ex: @coinbase | views are my own | what if it all worked out? 

ceo boost studios, core contributor of /boost

yes, you constantly iterate on the multipliers and obscure so people can't farm

Even with proof of humanity, you could verify your address and write scripts to maximize sequencer fees driven. Best way to reward users is hide the rules of the game.

Yes this is general current state 

We need to get to a point where Users want faster, cheaper, better xyz and the products onchain allow for that 

Or else you just have users using and switching between apps like they’re slot machines (I.e. Blast farming rn) 

E.g. I don’t do duolingo to earn points on my streak. I do it to learn Spanish

Until onchain apps/product gets there, also need to reward based on quality of engagement and contribution to the chain

Sounds like (partially) what Blast L2 did