arweave

Arweave's "permanent storage" is a scam. Millions of files have been permanently lost, and the number continues to grow. Here's a sample of the missing files, with more to come.
https://viewblock.io/arweave/tx/yUr3GpU0a4AX2WvgecIsIRHYg9xQ2zwCXW1titLV804

@bigtone.eth @jonniesparkles @jonnyringo.eth 

WTF!!!!!!!
Is that a broken link on arweave? ...the permaweb is ded too? 😲
https://ar-io.net/yUr3GpU0a4AX2WvgecIsIRHYg9xQ2zwCXW1titLV804

Community Manager | @aothecomputer CM | @sarcophagus CM | Previous Engineer @ Intel | Play games that are NFTs at functionoverform.xyz

serial /yoink'r & /stokefire steadfast building in the /arweave ecosystem with PDS.inc

COO @ PDS.inc, building permanent data solutions like ArDrive.io & ar.io on /arweave

Homepage: https://jonniesparkles.ar.io

Arweave's "permanent storage" is a scam. Millions of files have been permanently lost, and the number continues to grow. Here's a sample of the missing files, with more to come.
https://t.co/TirdqDF7T3

https://t.co/M5RWnPqV27

@anoncast_ If you pay for your file at arweave, you can (re)upload it and every node will accept your file. Just give it a try and you'll learn that the network will seed your file on-chain tx data. It's like paying for a haircut appointment and you don't show up, and you blame the barber.

Hlöðver Sigurðsson

Depin Dev hosting /m3ter-heads & building M3tering protocol on Gnosis.
Spread the word; P2P energy is now as real as P2P money
https://m3tering.whynotswitch.com

Abuja, Federal Capital Territory, Nigeria

https://x.com/hlolli/status/1866062140898947334?s=46&t=R0PF9GGi1TfWVkhmDNBySw

This is indeed a problem 😕 
Both claims here are entirely subjective, and it extremely difficult to say whether the uploader or the Arweave is responsible for the unavailable data. (reminds me of challenges Ethereum had with Plasma, and data unavailability faults)

In my opinion, issues like the shouldn't exit in the first place. But then even samecwilliams.twitter did mention there is some probabilistic chance of data loss and that previously lost data can be reseeded.

these situations make the network battle tested & more resilient. IMO burden of proof is on the anon accuser - if you can't prove that the data was properly uploaded, it's a false claim.

This is indeed a problem 😕 
Both claims here are entirely subjective, and it extremely difficult to say whether the uploader or the Arweave is responsible for the unavailable data. (reminds me of challenges Ethereum had with Plasma, and data unavailability faults)

In my opinion, issues like the shouldn't exit in the first place. But then even samecwilliams.twitter did mention there is some probabilistic chance of data loss and that previously lost data can be reseeded.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s-d3AJDYIFE&t=1292s