Effective Accelerationism e/acc

the vibes are off.
https://www.aipanic.news/p/when-effective-altruism-takes-a-dark

𝖒𝖆𝖓𝖉𝖆𝖙𝖚𝖒 𝖆𝖉 𝖆𝖘𝖙𝖗𝖆

Wow, I never thought “altruism” could have a negative ending

unfortunately, it's a motte-and-bailey (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motte-and-bailey_fallacy).

I really wish people were more curious about boring, relentlessly scalable altruism.

Art enthusiast, passionate about mental growth, and an ever-learning individual

Whattt !!😅, sorry to digress but this is the most logic-intense paragraph I’ve ever read

I never knew about motte and Bailey up until now 

A and B are different perspectives,
Challenging A means supporting B and not challenging A means agreeing with A

What back and forth is this😅

yeah, this is the same issue I have with Chris Langan's theory: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N-bRM1kYuNA

there's an ostensible, syntactic hint of coherency, but it's just abstracts stacked on abstracts with an ever-growing glossary. it never seems to reflect back to reality, i.e. challenging both A & B respectively.

I fully get you
I also detest unending, iterative, indefinite and inconclusive propositions, cos at the end of the day, no information is passed

Yesterday, you spoke about watching Dan’s AMA session, at a 1.75x, what playback speed did you watch this at ??

Cos it’s a 4hr+ video