Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Egregious attempt from the Gensler SEC to classify anything with a secondary market as securities. Where does it stop — Pokémon cards? Beanie Babies? Taylor Swift tickets?
46 replies
114 recasts
478 reactions

🗿 pfp
🗿
@bias
Maybe my logic doesn’t work for me this morning but how are finite material objects with a secondary market comparable to infinite virtual coins with secondary markets?
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
IANAL, but the definition of a security is well-defined. However, trying to classify an entire category / go after a general purpose platform is a pretty big expansion of scope. Are there NFT projects that fit the definition below? Probably. Are all NFTs securities? No.
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions

🗿 pfp
🗿
@bias
Under that definition, I don’t know how they haven’t tried to go after beanie babies and Pokémon cards, etc, the same way. Not saying I think they should, but with all the other out of pocket shit they seem to like to do, I’m very surprised they haven’t.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

accountless pfp
accountless
@accountless.eth
wtf is this
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction