Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Jason Goldberg โ๏ธ ๐
@betashop.eth
working on pushing some substantial improvements to Based Rewards as early as Thursday โ to make the system more fairly reward usage of base protocols weโll let everyone know about once itโs live and look forward to your feedback
10 replies
11 recasts
56 reactions
Yonii๐ธ
@macster
how's today working !? I came back yesterday ๐ฑ
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
frederick
@sgniwder
thursday's tomorrow ๐ love it!
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
CubJs
@cubjs
I donโt think there are significant advantages to locking up fan tokens under the current circumstances. Is there potential for improvement in the future?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Costi ๐น๏ธ ๐
@costi
Also, make it worth it for people to lock FTs. Because the sentiment is low on this subject. Not even "giving" is the same as before. You're not giving, directly, to people, anymore. Now add the situation with based rewards ...so, there's no good reason to lock your money in an extremely volatile environment. Add some gamification ...maybe give a good percentage of what people give ...as an extra buy&burn for their own FT. And bla bla, i'll stop. You can make this project very attractive, even without direct claiming of tokens. ๐
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Costi ๐น๏ธ ๐
@costi
Glad to hear about it, but... I want to give a pre-feedback. If those improvements(i'm concerned they're not "changes") are not translated into *giving fixed rewards according to rankings + a big leaderboard*... You're wasting your time and also the project potential. Please, make it a TRUE leaderboard. Because as it is now: - Makes no one care about the moxie score(has no value) - It will be more ugly at a higher MC(if it stays open for exploit) - Only 3-5 people get the most of it and they're farmers - In this environment, it will make the "token intelligence" skill, useless(basically, hurting the creator agent) All the time returning data of accounts(from base rewards leaderboard) "worth investing" ...but they will always be accounts of farmers with high MC in moxies. Which are not even worth buying.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
ihawaii.eth๐ฉ๐ญ
@ihawaii.eth
thx for keeping us updated
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Tanvir Hasan๐๐ญ๐โ๏ธ
@ovy151
Will these changes affect existing rewards, or only new activities?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
ลฮโโพโ โ ๐ฉโ๏ธ
@lenonmc21
I am glad to read this, it is very important that there is a balance and that everything is fairer for everyone. Thanks Chef
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Degury.degen.eth
@ddongguri
We need to revisit the Moxie reward structure. I think replacing rewards with token burns to reduce selling pressure was a good move. However, now that supply has been issued to a certain extent, we need to find ways to retain existing token holders while also attracting new ones. At this point, thereโs no real incentive for anyone to lock their tokens. If we look at other ecosystems, such as certain airdrop tokens or the AI agent token ecosystems, they continue to reward holders while building new ecosystems. However, in Moxieโs case, the Farcaster rewards model needs to be restructured. If the daily pool consists of 3.5 million tokens, I believe a new model is needed where rewards are distributed based on the percentage of a holder's locked tokens relative to the total amount of locked tokens. This would create a more balanced and sustainable system. @betashop.eth @ipeciura.eth
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
๐บ
@pyroeis.eth
$MOXIE
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
