Two big mistakes I see founders make:

(1) Having a “101-level” understanding of previous cycles / attempts at solving the same problem

(2) Having a “101-level” hypothesis for why NOW is the right time

Both these mistakes typically coincide with having a shallow “secret” only you know.

Both are solvable.

Operator turned investor. Work in TradFi. Exploring the future of social investing @crossroads.  🟪

Couldn't agree more. 
What frustrates me further is that some of these founders have been able to secure adequate financing with this kind of thinking. Once again I'm reminded of what I think should qualify vs what actually does.

off & onchain operations
<--->
Sharing ideas over at /workflow <--->
Problem solving is my jam😎
🎩

seemore.tv/free/fc/adam-

Excellent point. 

My comments certainly extend indirectly / adjacently to the investors funding the ideas.

That said getting funded / deploying capital is a milestone to celebrate, but shouldn't be viewed as a goal not a win (to use a sports analogy).

The win comes at exit / return of capital to LPs.

*should be viewed…

not “shouldn’t”

I share a similar outlook, as its the responsible and credible approach. However as bull turned to bear and the tide came in, you could see the litteny of founders who either lost focus or simply didn't take this point sersiously. 
By contrast, those that did look even better to investors in this current climate.