Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
I'm an open-minded person to nearly all feedback. But if you want me to engage, don't threaten me. It's not effective and I'll just ignore your permanently.
16 replies
2 recasts
92 reactions
Samo
@samo.eth
Could also be a lack of comms on your part, Dan. If ppl can't understand they're not losing anything, comms should be better. And if they ARE losing something after putting a ton of work... not great. Yes, threats aren't acceptable. But faulty comms aren't ok at all in crypto 2024 (even tho that's the norm)
3 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
Nova DAO
@novadao
No, I'm sorry. If you're a channel owner and you have missed this change that is 100% on you. They have posted about it so much now that if you haven't seen it (including the DC...) that's on the channel owner.
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
Samo
@samo.eth
it’s always on the “customer”, I know 😂
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Ben - [C/x]
@benersing
Nope. 99 “customers” feel communications were good, 1 does not. 🤷
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Samo
@samo.eth
I like your research style, but I like numbers instead. 🤷 When someone complains, there’s a pain point there and an opportunity. If the claim is legit (non-bot/bogus/threat), it should be addressed. If there are multiple, it could be a lack of comms. Dan addressed it.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
