Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions
Barry
@baz.eth
Hey all - just wanted to share some of my concerns about the public nature of our casts/behavior on FC. Hoping for an open dialogue on where we think this is headed, and in the long run, how to provide privacy protections from a user content perspective. https://paragraph.xyz/@barrycollier/farcaster-content-graph
20 replies
9 recasts
72 reactions
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Thanks for writing this up. The Farcaster protocol is focused on real-time, public information. Don't use it if you are worried about information being public. Anyone is free to use the graph to build a privacy-focused social network. So nothing stopping someone from building something that focuses on your goals.
2 replies
0 recast
22 reactions
Barry
@baz.eth
Thanks, Dan. I'll need to think about the implications of that more, but I think my overall concerns are still multi-fold. It's not about "my" personal data, but the growth potential and implications of a fully open content graph at scale that concerns me (as a builder). Will think on it more. Thanks for reading.
2 replies
0 recast
3 reactions
daws.eth
@daws
I lean towards agreeing. Especially with all parts of the API open and public I don't think "squashing the bot problem" will ever be possible on an open network. Here to be a part of the solution if there is one ⚡️
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Barry
@baz.eth
Thanks, daws. @dwr.eth mentioned sophisticated bots using LLMs, which is precisely my point I can train an AI agent on your personality (profiled from your casts/engagement) to engage with you with specific intentions Now envision that at the scale of FC's goal of 1B+ DAU https://warpcast.com/dwr.eth/0x68819d94
0 reply
1 recast
0 reaction
