Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions
Barry
@baz.eth
Hey all - just wanted to share some of my concerns about the public nature of our casts/behavior on FC. Hoping for an open dialogue on where we think this is headed, and in the long run, how to provide privacy protections from a user content perspective. https://paragraph.xyz/@barrycollier/farcaster-content-graph
20 replies
9 recasts
72 reactions
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Thanks for writing this up. The Farcaster protocol is focused on real-time, public information. Don't use it if you are worried about information being public. Anyone is free to use the graph to build a privacy-focused social network. So nothing stopping someone from building something that focuses on your goals.
2 replies
0 recast
22 reactions
Barry
@baz.eth
Thanks, Dan. I'll need to think about the implications of that more, but I think my overall concerns are still multi-fold. It's not about "my" personal data, but the growth potential and implications of a fully open content graph at scale that concerns me (as a builder). Will think on it more. Thanks for reading.
2 replies
0 recast
3 reactions
vrypan |--o--|
@vrypan.eth
How is this different than feeding all my blog posts to ChatGPT?
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
Barry
@baz.eth
1. It doesn't take that much data. I got a decent profile with a few hundred casts 2. I'm not talking about the impact of one person (u/me), but the impact of bad actors being able to analyze/manipulate millions at scale. Doesn't have to be perfect, just predictive If FC is never going to reach that scale, no problem
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
