Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions

Brandon Yoshizawa ๐ŸŽฉ๐Ÿ”ต๐Ÿ’Ž pfp
Brandon Yoshizawa ๐ŸŽฉ๐Ÿ”ต๐Ÿ’Ž
@bay-photography
This will be interesting. Out of my 16k followers, only about 22% are unlikely spam. I'm all for cleaning out bots and don't care for a "count" if engagement isn't even showing anyway. My only concern is those who are not accurately labeled as I've heard various artists cry out about this. Hopefully the spam label will continue to evolve to only target the true spammers / bots.
6 replies
0 recast
12 reactions

Purpleman.base.eth ๐ŸŽฉ pfp
Purpleman.base.eth ๐ŸŽฉ
@jenson
What's the query to check this bro?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Sammyfrello๐ŸŽฉ pfp
Sammyfrello๐ŸŽฉ
@sammyfrello
Hopefully, cause I was in this spam place before and itโ€™s not good.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Callum Wanderloots โœจ pfp
Callum Wanderloots โœจ
@wanderloots.eth
Thatโ€™s showing all of the levels though. I think the middle class should be tbd for the moment, because they donโ€™t have sufficient info to classify the user. What is the number above that? Of people actually likely to be spammers?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

samrat1446.eth๐Ÿ–๐ŸŽฉ pfp
samrat1446.eth๐Ÿ–๐ŸŽฉ
@samrat1446.eth
Thank you for sharing bro
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

A10Apictures pfp
A10Apictures
@praytobewith
The app is sensitive to the slightest movements of the members, I even saw that it became suspicious of me when I was inactive.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction