Stephan
@stephancill
removing the cost for real users to join and contribute to the network is an existential problem farcaster needs to solve most people don't pay for social media - doesn't matter if it's $1 or $10 - it's not something they're used to this is also an existential problem for apps building on farcaster
18 replies
3 recasts
35 reactions
baubergo
@baubergo-
This is interesting. We’re accustomed to “free” web2 solutions, but they make money through shady, non-transparent methods. Web3 solutions, on the other hand, change that dynamic by charging you upfront and offering a chance to earn money on their platform. Unlike web2, where 90% of users end up paying just to stay visible, web3 provides a more transparent and potentially rewarding experience imo. But yes, the start (change of behavior) is always a very friction problem.
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
Stephan
@stephancill
i agree that incentives are not aligned in web2 i disagree that an upfront fee is the way to solve that (it's also not working for twitter/X) i also don't think people join social networks to make money
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
baubergo
@baubergo-
I don't think that's the way too. But I do believe it's more transparent tho. People always join social networks to make money, indirectly. Initially, people might have used Instagram because it was cool, but now it's primarily a platform for advertising. Whether for companies or personal brands, it's how we market ourselves these days.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Stephan
@stephancill
all of my friends use social media and none of them are making money there are tons of other sources of value in social: entertainment, learning, discussing niche topics, meeting new people
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Derek
@badadvicehq
I couldn't have said this better. It boils down to making money eventually.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction