Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
baubergo
@baubergo-
@jacek and team, please remember your roots and what helped you build such a strong community around DEGEN. Engage with the builders and active users instead of relying on feedback from just a few posts in the timeframe of 3 days. If you don't have the time to be here frequently, arrange a group that can provide ongoing feedback. Avoid shouting out decisions at the same time a dump is happening as this can send the wrong message, especially if they can be related somehow, even if it wasn't your intent. Some great builders and users you should stay in touch: @edit @undefined @nonlinear.eth @matthewfox @rjs @nikolaiii @maretus @apex777.eth @meguce and many others.
4 replies
0 recast
18 reactions
Maning🎩
@maning
Lets see what they are preparing, but tbh Im scared! Im not extreamly happy with how allowance works now but at least is about numbers, hope they see the people that were here since the beginning
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
baubergo
@baubergo-
The current system rewards those who provide quality answers and network with others, strengthening the network. If the metric shifts to "who stakes more," it will become a whale game, pushing quality casters to the sidelines.
2 replies
0 recast
3 reactions
Maning🎩
@maning
definitely no bueno. If this change to something that its not based on the activity or good casts we are done… I can stake all my degen but is that the way we want to do it? Last time they reduced the allowance so much to try to pump the price and we know how it ended
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Babbexx22 🎩🎭
@babbexx22
Staking as the sole way out is gonna be a disaster. Other existing metrics should be sustained, especially the open rank system. Staking should only be a multiplier and not the core measure around which the whole allowance allocation is based. And like you said, their feedback mechanisms need to be seriously reviewed. This is a community driven project and should be treated as such.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
