Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/light
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
LGHT
@lght.eth
sauna notes: the existential bottleneck of crypto from my pov is that it is aware of the qualitative functions needed to embolden the quantitative infrastructure yet it suffers from two areas of valid concern: 1. funding is hard to justify for things that don’t equate to metrics 1=1 (ppl have families, bills, responsibilities & there are plenty of margins you can squeeze in a utilitarian pov) 2. talent is plenty in one regard and incredibly sparse in the more meaningful sense (willing but unable, able but unwilling) it’s an ironic problem due to the enormous amounts of capital availability for reasonably-objective redundancies, grifts, honeypots, and clones doubly ironic due to the fundamental theory of the tech being cooperative, modular, and open; yet struggling comprehensively in materialization
5 replies
0 recast
28 reactions
max ↑
@baseddesigner.eth
could be that it's really hard to push for unifying things without authority like with the USB cables, everyone was just inventing their own, now in crypto this issue is hundreds time bigger at the end of the day just have to commit to one and security wise ethereum seems to win it with amount of devs etc.
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
max ↑
@baseddesigner.eth
and that win is among geeks and others in crypto, not a win in the rest of the world
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
LGHT
@lght.eth
in a meta sense i think you’re onto something op is more anecdotal or team focused & an illustration of how challenging it is to actually connect the dots between the members that form a network ethereum i believe to be one of the winners long term but even there i start to question why centralized bodies won’t opt in for creating their own centralized chain that’s more a soft ponder tho
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
