Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Tim Roughgarden pfp
Tim Roughgarden
@tr
I'm going back on the academic lecture circuit in 2024 (often with skeptical audiences), so I'm currently fine-tuning my blockchain+web3 arguments/analogies/explanations. Feedback very welcome!!
5 replies
1 recast
13 reactions

Varun Srinivasan pfp
Varun Srinivasan
@v
Initial reactions: internet = neutral infrastructure is not clicking. it's technically right but doesn't evoke the aha moment when we compare to blockchains.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Tim Roughgarden pfp
Tim Roughgarden
@tr
Thanks for the feedback! Thoughts on alternatives?
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

balajis pfp
balajis
@balajis.eth
It boils down to who has root. I think the fundamental innovation of blockchains is that they are open state databases, where it’s standard to have many different root users. That’s new. https://balajis.com/p/yes-you-may-need-a-blockchain
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

balajis pfp
balajis
@balajis.eth
You might also like this. Blockchains as the new rule-based order. https://foreignpolicy.com/2021/12/11/bitcoin-ethereum-cryptocurrency-web3-great-protocol-politics/
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions