Aziz Mansour
@azizz
Some quick calculations I did regarding the $ANIME token from the Azuki project: Total supply: 10 billion Circulating supply: 7.5 billion Price estimates and potential: In short, Azuki is a strong brand, comparable in significance to the Pudgy Penguins collection. Let’s assume $ANIME achieves half the market cap that Pudgy Penguins did. Pudgy Penguins’ peak market cap: $4 billion Current market cap: $1.9 billion Let’s assume $ANIME reaches only $1 billion market cap. This would set the token price at approximately $0.13 (or even higher). NFT Holder Share: Let’s calculate the potential earnings for Zora NFTs from this market cap: According to the tokenomics, 37.5% of $ANIME is allocated to the Azuki community. If Zora NFTs are included and just 2% is distributed to NFT holders: $20 million allocated to NFT holders Total NFTs: 90,000 Each NFT would earn $222 per piece held in your wallet 👌.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Aziz Mansour
@azizz
Key Point: Zora NFTs were a free mint—just pay a few cents in gas fees. If more is allocated to NFT holders or the token price increases, the earnings could be significantly higher. Partner Allocation Scenario: If NFTs are counted under the partner allocation (2%), which includes major partners like Arbitrum: Let’s assume 1% is allocated to Zora NFTs. That would result in $10 million, or roughly $100+ per NFT. This is practically free money 👆. Who still says crypto doesn’t offer opportunities or money? Additional Note: If the team decides to distribute rewards based on unique wallets instead of the number of NFTs held, profits could multiply. This would limit wallets holding 10, 20, or even 100 NFTs from taking a disproportionate share. What are your thoughts?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
