Ghostlinkz
@ghostlinkz.eth
Looks like im gona have to tone it down with that like button. s/o @sammdec.eth for building this very useful tool for us caststorage.com
9 replies
1 recast
11 reactions
notdevin
@notdevin.eth
😳
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
memes4airdrop
@wake
I guess this is cheaper than liking. :)
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Ghostlinkz
@ghostlinkz.eth
You are making a good point here. This could result in users leaving more comments instead of likes 🤔 I know for sure I should stop liking every reply others make to me, especially when I end up replying right back.
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Ayush
@ayushm.eth
Do you really care though if your earlier likes get deleted?
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Ghostlinkz
@ghostlinkz.eth
It depends, maybe you use likes as bookmarks. Or maybe you are just really serious about your actions/data. Everyone is different I suppose. But for data scientists, having everything available is crucial to do accurate analysis.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ayush
@ayushm.eth
Bookmarks can be implemented by clients without it being in protocol The data point is good; i wonder, if a hub runner can choose to store all data (never prune)? Seems like an implementation detail for the node without affecting the protocol? @v @dwr.eth
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ghostlinkz
@ghostlinkz.eth
Yes, this is the general answer. Let clients and indexers fill the void, but I’m willing to bet that if Farcaster scales successfully, many users will be happy to pay to keep their data on the protocol forever. It just depends on what you value.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
