Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

artlu pfp
artlu
@artlu
Round Table Question: should SassyHash be allowed in channels as opt-out, rather than opt-in? I'm thinking to let the decoder work outside of the opted-in channels for a fixed-length experiment. what do you think? --- the promised antidote to bots-run-wild is AI 🤝 crypto. Farcaster is well positioned to figure this out with multiple shots on goal. I don't think we are close to needing it, but I think we can see the need in the future. Bot accounts can only read SassyHash if channel owner gives their bot FID membership, and can revoke at any time. SassyHash allows self-organizing groups to communicate in dialects that only members of the tribe know how to use
1 reply
1 recast
3 reactions

artlu pfp
artlu
@artlu
my north star is pro-social adoption of SassyHash
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Roadu 🎩🦊 pfp
Roadu 🎩🦊
@roadu
very very offtopic for your roundtable question here but i personally think sassyhash could be the basis of an entire social network where only ones followers (at the time of the post) can read a given post and everything is sassyhashed by default
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction